lunes, 3 de julio de 2017

Research project: Freinet Prometeo

One of the first assisgnments the teacher left us was to go to a school that encourages active learning and its curriculum was based on constructivism, observe a class and interview the teacher.
We decide to choose Prometeo’s school for this project and unfortunately we didn’t have the opportunity to observe a proper class but my classmates, Mireya Morales and Daniel Bolaños, were able to interview the school’s principal.
Celestin Freinet (1896-1966) was a French educator and creator of new teaching methods and techniques based on the creative work of students. He based his research on pedagogical style and methods that are grounded in personality theory and individual initiative, and on his experience of teaching in the public schools in France.
Freinet believed that children only play because they can’t work or that play is always a reflection of the real world and as such the ideal learning environment is one where children are co-creators and producers and get to work alongside teachers and adults. He believed that it was vital for children to learn in and about the real world. He also said that school should provide opportunities for all kinds of artistic action which can bring balance to the child's development and enrichment of personality because artistic endeavor can be therapeutic, and can bring satisfaction, challenge, and the feeling of accomplishment.
They work with the natural method that says that authentic learning is created by using real experiences. The activities are chosen based on children’s interests because they need to be motivated to learn on their own.
Another characteristic of this method is the fact that we the students are responsible for cleaning the areas where they work.
Something that got my attention was the fact that children are involved in serious decisions about the school. Decisions that go from where to go on school excursions to new teachers or upcoming events.


In conclusion, the main goal of education, according to Freinet, is to arouse in students an interest in learning and to develop positive attitudes toward it.  It would have been nice to see Freinet’s theory applied in a real class but the school’s principal provided my classmates with useful information to understand a bit more about the theory. I think the way they work is really interesting and different to what we are used to see. 

The presentation was created by:
Mireya Morales
Daniel Bolaños

Summative Assessment: Testing

In this blog entry, I talk about what it is language assessment, how we categorize it, types of tests, and the guiding principles that govern testing design, focusing more on validity and reliability. You will be able to find concept maps and a video, which take form of an interview, explain what I already mentioned.

Introduction to issues in language assessment

When we hear the word assessment, we often think about the pencil-and-paper test that happens at the end of the course that makes students really stressed because, now the teacher is going to know how much they don’t know and he or she is probably going to fail them. But assessment is so much more than tests. Actually, assessment includes a wide range of activities and tasks that teachers use to evaluate students’ progress and growth during the course, and their development at the end of it.
The following map is based on the reading Introduction to Issues in Language Assessment and Terminology.



First of all, we need to define some terms. Evaluation is the widest basis for the gathering of information in education and it concerns analyzing all the factors that influence the teaching-learning process, such as syllabus objectives, course design and materials. Assessment is part of evaluation; it refers to the different ways that teachers gather information about learners’ language ability and their achievements. And last but not least, testing is a subcategory of assessment, and it is a systematic, formal procedure to collect information about students’ behavior.
We, as teachers, have the responsibility of choosing the best option of testing for a particular group of students in a particular context, so it is useful to categorize tests by purpose, type or stage of the course.

We have six different types of test:
·         Placement tests. They assess students level of language and to position students in an appropriate course. This helps to have classes that are homogeneous in level proficiency.
·         Aptitude tests. They measure our general ability or capacity to learn a foreign language, an example of this type of test is the MLAT, which is the Modern Language Aptitude Test developed by Caroll and Sapon in 1958.
·         Diagnostic tests. They help to identify areas in which a student needs further help.
·         Progress tests. They measure the development that students are making during the course.
·         Achievement test. They are similar to progress tests because they also determine what students have learned regarding to course outcomes and they are typically applied at mid- and end-point of the course.
·         Proficiency test. They are not based on a particular curriculum or program, and they asses the language ability at varying levels. An example of this test is the TOEFL, which measure English language proficiency of foreign students.

There are other ways of labeling test, for example Objective Tests  which are scored by comparing a student’s responses with an established set of correct responses on an answer key, with this labeling test the qualifier doesn’t require particular knowledge in the examined area. On the other hand is Subjective Test that requires scoring by personal judgment so, in this case, the human element is very important.
There are Criterion-Referenced Tests (CRTs), which are usually developed to measure mastery of well-defined instructional objectives specific to a particular program; according to Brown, the purpose of this test is to measure how much learning the student has achieved.  Norm-Referenced Tests (NRT) also called Standardized Tests are designed to gauge language abilities, -based on Brown, - the purpose of an NRTs are to spread out a continuum of scores. Test results are interpreted with reference to the performance of a given large group of students who are similar to the individuals for whom the test was designed.
Summative Assessment is used at the end of the course to determine if students have achieved the objectives set out in the curriculum. Formative Assessment aims to use the results to improve instruction, so feedback is provided to students during the course.
High Stakes Tests are those in which the results are likely to have a big impact in our lives, for example TOEFL; and finally the Low Stakes Tests are those that have a small impact in our lives, a clear example of these are the class test and short quizzes.

Is important to understand that designing a test is highly complex, and there are basic principles that are essential when doing so. The guiding principles that govern testing design are
  • ·         Usefulness
  • ·         Validity
  • ·         Reliability
  • ·         Practicality
  • ·         Washback
  • ·         Authenticity
  • ·         Transparency
  • ·         Security

To have a better understanding of two of these principles, which are validity and reliability, here you have a concept map of each one. The maps are based on the information of articles about reliability and validity.

This is the map for test validity:


And this is the map for test reliability:



As we can see, there are a lot of factors to take  into consideration when designing a test, that go from the situation that it is created for, to the purpose that it serves, to the group of people that it is evaluating, and many other ones. You can’t take this matter lightly, and because It is an extremely complex work, it helps to know what type of test you are creating and the principles that it has to follow. 

The maps were creted by: 
Adriana Aquino
Diana Jiménez López
Maria Juana Reyes Parada


Video: Talking about Testing

 Why do teachers make quizzes? Why do schools create high-stakes tests for students? Why do teachers create low-stakes test during the course?  The answer seems obvious: to see what they have learned. However, tests serve many other purposes in schools beyond just helping assigning a grade according to the result of the student. Designing and doing a test is a really tricky matter because testing can measure successful memorization of facts or the effective application of critical thinking skills.  Although test-taking can cause anxiety or stress in some students, the desire to do well  can help keep students motivated, but it is our task to keep them motivated not just to get a good grade but also to be excited about learning .
 

In the following video, which takes the form of an interview, my classmates and I are talking about testing, types of tests, how tests are labeled, among other things. We based on the information that was already mentioned at the beginnig of this blog entry.


As a conclusion, assessment is an integral part of instruction, as it determines whether or not the goals of education are being achieved.  Assessment inspires teachers to ask themselves questions like:  "Are we teaching what we think we are teaching?" "Are students learning what they are supposed to be learning?" "Is there a way to teach the subject better?". And making teachers ask themselves these questions is a pivotal task to see if they are meeting the curriculum objectives.

My experience doing the  video: 
I enjoyed doing this activity. We had to understand the information so it didn't sound so robotic when answering the question, and we had to practice so it seemed more natural. So at the end of the shooting of the video, the information was more stucked in my mind. And, as in the previous team vide, it was interesting and useful as a learning tool because everyone brought something different to the task. 

The video was created by:
Maria Juana Reyes Parada
Adriana Aquino
Diana Jiménez López

Formative Assessment: Integration

In this entry you will be able to find an example of an oral presentation rubric, an example of a scale, and an example of a checklist. Each one of them is better described in their sections.

Rubric:  Oral presentation

First of all, we had to determined what we were going to assess, in this case, we wanted to assess some oral presentations of our classmates.
When we started doing our rubric, the teacher provided us with some reading about rubrics (reading 1 and reading 2) , and we looked for other examples of rubrics evaluating oral presentations. 
We obviously need to define what we want to evaluate in order to know the characteristics it should have.
Therefore, speaking is defined as an interactive process of constructing meaning that involves producing, receiving and processing information. Its form and meaning depend on the context in which it occurs, the participants that are involve in the process, and the purposes of speaking (Burns & Joyce, 1997).

Speaking is the students' ability to express themselves orally, coherently, fluently and appropriately in a given meaningful context to serve both transactional and interactional purposed using correct pronunciation, grammar and vocabulary and adopting the pragmatic and discourse rules of the spoken language, in this case, English. They are required to show mastery of the following sub competencies:
  • Linguistic competence: This includes using intelligible pronunciation, following grammatical rules accurately, and using a relevant and appropriate range of vocabulary.
  •  Discourse competence: This includes structuring the discourse coherently and cohesively, and managing the conversation and interacting effectively to keep the conversation going, especially at the end, when the questions happen.
  •  Pragmatic competence: This involves expressing a range of functions effectively and appropriately according to the context and register.
  • Fluency: This means speaking fluently demonstrating a reasonable rate of speech.

In an article about oral presentation, Stephen Billups suggested that some guidelines for a good oral presentation  are:
1. Having a clear purpose
2. Addressing the intended audience at their level
3. It is well-organized, including a clear introduction, which motivates and previews the talk, and a summary
4. Avoiding unnecessary details, and staying in topic all of the time
5. Using well-designed visual aids
6. Engaging the audience
7. And, ending on time

We used Rubistar, which is a tool that allows you to create your own rubrics. It provides you the format and it also gives you some examples of different types of rubrics, the categories or aspects that you can evaluate in them, and the descriptions for each aspect. In our case, we chose to assess five aspects or categories: organization, mastery of the content, verbal effectiveness, delivery, and visual-aids. 
Here is the rubric that we came up with: oral presentation rubric




Rubistar was really easy to use and it actually gave us a starting point, it helped us to choose which aspects we wanted to evaluate and the actual characteristics of those aspects. I would absolutely recommend it to other teachers because using it is not only helpful but it’s also very quick to utilize.

When it was time for its application, I found two main struggles: the first one was that there were some aspects that we didn't covered in our rubric and that when I wanted to evaluate them, it was difficult to choose where to place them. And the second one was that it was difficult to me to evaluate them as a team, because some of them accomplished the characteristics of an aspect and some of them didn't, so I got confused about how to evaluate them. 

The rubric was made by:
Maria Juana Reyes Parada
Adriana Aquino
Diana Jiménez López

Scale


A scale is a tool used for assessing the performance of tasks, skill levels, procedures, processes, qualities, quantities, and many other end products, such as reports, presentations, drawings, etc.
These are judged at a defined level within a stated range. Rating scales are similar to checklists except that they indicate the degree of accomplishment rather than just yes or no. Scales list performance statements in one column and the range of accomplishment in descriptive words or numbers, in other columns. These other columns form “the scale” and can indicate a range of achievement, such as from poor to excellent, never to always, beginning to exemplary, or strongly disagree to strongly agree.

Effective rating scales use descriptors with clearly understood measures, such as frequency. Scales that rely on subjective descriptors of quality, such as fair, good or excellent, are less effective because the single adjective does not contain enough information on what criteria are indicated at each of these points on the scale.

The scale that I designed was based on a revision of the Minerva Model. I used a scale from 1 to 4, 1 being the lowest rating and 4 being the highest. 
  




Here it is the link to download the scale: Minerva model's scale

As a conclusion, I thought making a scale was very easy but it turned out it wasn't. You need to be careful when you choose your parameters, for example if you want to evaluate frequency or effectiveness, because that will govern your overall instrument. 


Checklist

First, we need to define what a checklist is. A checklist  is a tool for identifying the presence or absence of conceptual knowledge, skills, elements, or behaviors. Checklists are used for identifying whether key tasks in a procedure, process, or activity have been completed. 
They usually offer a yes/no format in relation to student demonstration of specific criteria. This is similar to a light switch; the light is either on or off. They may be used to record observations of an individual, a group or a whole class.

The checklist I designed is based on the characteristicas and the elements that our blogs should have. I took 12 aspects into consideration and there should be 18 elements in our blogs, from maps, to videos, to other assessment tools. 



Here is the link to download the checklist: Blog checklist

To summarize, the purpose of checklists and rating scales  is to:
  • ·         provide tools for systematic recording of observations
  •       provide tools for self-assessment
  • ·         provide samples of criteria so students can know what it's soing to be evaluated ··         .

Questions 

To finish this never-ending entry, I will answer some questions about the blog as a learning tool and as an assessment tool.

1. How does the blog work for the teacher, classmates and me? 
For all of us is a portfolio, in which we can find our assignments in an organized way and it allows us to add to our post all types of formats and content. It provides, not only to the teacher, but to us as well a kind of time-lapse work, where we could see our progress and our improvement on designing assessment tools and on the way we express ourselves when we are explaining the topics.
The blog shows our level of understanding about the topics. And it was a source of feedback, not only from my classmates but I could also see my mistakes and the thing I could improve on.

2. To what extent does it match in practice with what I read?
I think that all the reading that the teacher gave us helped me to create every work in my blog. Every reading was useful and accurate to the topic. If I wouldn’t have read the articles, I wouldn’t have being able to accomplish what the teacher asked for, because I used the readings not only for the concept maps but I also used them for my videos, my tests, my rubrics, and every other task. They did not only provide me with the content for my work but they also gave steps and tips to do the tasks.

3. Would I implement it in my own classes? Why?
Yes, as the reading said, you can be used in any grade level and in any curriculum and I found the blog very useful and accessible. You can enter and have the resources whenever and wherever. It’s an interactive tool, and you can receive feedback, when making the blog, from your teacher and your classmates. From their points of view, you can learn something different, whether it is their method of organization or a different understanding of a topic. 

domingo, 2 de julio de 2017

Maps, Rubrics and Portfolios

In this new entry, you will find more about formative assessment, specifically formative-assessment tools. You'll be able to find more about maps, rubrics and portfolios. 
I got the information from some readings that my teacher provided me with in class. The readings are concept mapsrubrics, and portfolios


We use assessment tools to measure how much our students have learned up to a particular point in time, and formative assessments help us, teachers, to be able to do something if there are problems understanding a topic because it happens when the learning is still happening and it gives us time to modify our future instruction.

Formative assessment has tools like:
  • Concept maps
  • Rubrics
  • Porfolios
Concept maps are tools that are useful to construct, organize, and communicate knowledge and they promote active learning because they involve students to pursuit their own knowledge. They are visual presentations that explicate ideas with key concepts by arranging them into topics and subtopics. 
Arslan (2006) suggests thatt there are three things that students should do when making a concept map:
  1.  Write key concepts inside shapes
  2. Link lines to show the connection between the concepts
  3. Write link phrases to describe the relations between them.
There are different types of concept maps:
  • Anticipatory guides. Students have to respond to several teacher-generated statements or questions
  • Central and Hierarchical maps. They are structured around a central topic and the information is presented in order of importance.
  • Comparative maps. As its name says, it exists a comparison between two or more concepts
  • Directional maps. The information is presented in a sequence as a timeline or a flowchart.
  • Pictorial or Landscape maps. The information is presented with pictures, landscapes or symbols.
  • Semantic maps. They are used to introduce, review and clarify previously learned and newly introduced information.
  • Serial maps. They are a series of evolving maps that students can create about a single topic over a specified period of time. 
  • Spider maps. The information is presented in a hierarchical and interrelated way.
  • Systems. The information is organized in parts and each one of them represents an input and output.
  • Webbing. The information is arranged in groups and sub-groups that show relation between them. 

Rubrics are another type of formative assessment tool  and it sets the expectations and desired outcomes. They describe the different levels of quality from proficient to poor for a specific project. 
They provide feedback to both, teachers and students, and they also provide detailed information about students' strengths and weaknesses. 
There are three types of rubrics:
  • Analytical rubrics: They separate assignments into individual parts and evaluate each part separately.  
  • Holistic rubrics: They evaluate the overall assignment as a whole. 
  • Scoring and Primary rubrics: They are used by instructors to assign grades and they supply guidelines that describe the characteristics of the different levels of performance. 
And last but not least, portfolios. A portfolio is a collection of individual students' work which documents their performance and their growth over an specific period of time. They emphazise participation, engagement and understanding . They also give the opportunity to practice peer review by analyzing other classmates' work. 
The different types of portfolios are:
  • Developmental. They document students' progress in a particular class throughout the school year. 
  • Proficiency. Their goal is to prove mastery in a specific area.
  • Showcase. They document only students' best work.
  • College admission. Some colleges ask their participants for this type of portfolios to have a look of their capabilities. 
  • Employment skills. They demonstrate an applicant's job readiness.
  • Writing portfolios. One of the first uses of portfolios in education.
  • Electronic portfolios. As their name describes, they are potrfolios that are stored on a server or CD-ROM and students can add images, audios or even video content.

And here is a video I created talking more about the topic: 



In conclusion, these formative assessment tools have similarities and differences, and also advantages and disadvantages. And we need to know how to used them, in order to serve an specific purpose, to help us assess our students and being able to give them feedback at the same time as we receive it. 

Formative and Summative Assessment


Assessment is a very wide topic that encompasses everything from statewide tests to everyday classroom tests, and not only tests but also everyday reviewed activities. The more information we have about students, the clearer the picture teachers have about achievement or where learning gaps may occur.

There are two mayor types of assessments, which are formative and summative assessment. In this entry, you will be able to find a concept map and a video explaining what summative and formative assessments are, their similarities, their differences and some examples. We got our information from the reading "Formative & Summative Assessments" and further reasearch. 

And here is the video:
  


To summarize, formative assessments provide both students and teachers with the information they need to improve the learning process while it's happening, and they provide students with feedback rather than a grade.
And summative assessments are generally administered at the end of a unit or course. Unlike formative assessments, which may occur several times during a course or unit, summative assessments occur only a few times over the course of the academic year. A common goal of this type of evaluation is to measure the mastery of learning standards. Lastly, summative assessments always yield a grade.

My experience doing the video

This was one of the last video that I filmed for this course and it was a team-work activity so, for me, it was easier to be in front of the camera. As a learning tool, the video was interesting and kind of challenging, because we had to rehearse the content so we would be able to sound sure about what we were talking about and everyone brought something different to the task. But at the end of the day, the video was an useful and effective learning tool. 

The video was created by:
Maria Juana Reyes Parada
Adriana Aquino
Diana Jiménez López


martes, 20 de junio de 2017

B1 Empower vocabulary test

Vocabulary test


This test was designed with the tool of Google Forms, which is usually used to create surveys and tests that people can answer online. 

The test is based around the vocabulary of the first six units of the “B1 Empower” book, which talk about common and personality adjectives, tourism, travel collocations, money, clothes and appearance, work, jobs, -ed and –ing adjectives, get collocations, sports and activities, education collocations, and multiple-word verbs.


The items are multiple-choice questions or fill-in-the-gaps, the students must choose the correct or most appropriate answer, and the test is designed to last 30 minutes. 

Here is the link to answer the test:



My experience during the process of making this test was not the best. Although the tool is very easy to use, my teammates were not helpful, so it made the experience stressful. Also I found difficult to organized the different types of items in the test, and there was a lot of vocabulary in the units and it was hard to choose which words to put on the test.  

Hot Potatoes test

Hot Potatoes test

In this blog post I present to you 3 sections of a test. The test was designed by other two classmates and me and the items are based around three reading materials that our learning evaluation’s teacher gave us in the class and these are:

1. Homework, written by Bhaswati Ghosh.
2. Concept Mapping, written by Tricia Smith, Ed. D.
3. Evaluation and Grading, written by Peter Elbow and is a passage from his book "Everyone can write: Essays Toward a Hopeful Theory of Writing and Teaching Writing"

The test was made with a software called “Hot Potatoes” and it allows you to create different kinds of activities you can use in tests. Some of the kinds of exercises you can create with Hot Potatoes are:
1. Fill-in-the-blank activities
2. Cross words
3. Put in order a sentence
4. Matching elements
5. Multiple-choice questions
6. Short-answer questions.

Specifications

The test has three sections and there are 10 items per section. Each section concerns a different topic. During the first section, you need to match the term with the corresponding definition and it´s about types of concept maps. The second section is a true-or-false activity and you must read the statements and determine if they are true or if they are false according to the reading about homework. And last but not least, the final activity is a fill-in-the-gap exercise and it based on the reading about evaluation and grading.

Here are the links to answer each section:

Matching elements- Concept Mapping
HTM file: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B5DWQbOLcAxxUmV2dG01ajB4VEU
Hot Potatoes file: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B5DWQbOLcAxxbGs4elQxOHBiS3M

True or false- Homework
HTM file: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B5DWQbOLcAxxbGQ4U2E0bGVkQ0U
Hot Potatoes file: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B5DWQbOLcAxxajQ3WFBocVZITW8

Fill in the gaps- Evaluation and grading 
HTM file: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B5DWQbOLcAxxby0weE4xNk9yX00
Hot Potatoes file: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B5DWQbOLcAxxUlJ5QnNQd3FiWkk

Lastly, the experience of designing the test provided me with a bigger understanding of what it implies and how much time you take doing it. Also Hot Potatoes is a very useful tool to make test and it’s easy to use.